Guidance
Guidance for Using Artificial Intelligence
Responsible use of AI tools includes complying with applicable district policies, regulations, and legal requirements that protect confidential, personal, and institutional data. It also requires adherence to ethical principles that promote transparency, accountability, equity, and fairness. Faculty, staff, administrators, and students are encouraged to understand both the opportunities and risks associated with AI and to use these technologies in ways that support RSCCD’s mission. By embracing responsible AI practices, the District and its colleges can harness the benefits of innovation while maintaining trust, integrity, and a commitment to the success of all those we serve.
Responsible Use of AI
Policies & Guidelines
| Tool | Public Data | Internal Data | Internal FERPA Protected Data |
Restricted Data |
| Copilot (Logged on with District paid license and district Issued Account) |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Copilot (Not logged on or logged on with personal account) |
✓ | |||
|
Gemini * (Not logged on or logged |
✓ | |||
|
ChatGPT ** (Not logged on or logged
|
✓ | |||
|
Claude (Not logged on or logged
|
✓ |
* District issued accounts for Google Gemini are expected to be available by Spring 2027
**A limited number of District issued ChatGPT accounts will be available for a one-year pilot late Fall 2026
Yes, section 17.0 on Administrative Regulation 3720 provides general guidance on the acceptable use of AI: Microsoft Word - AR 3720 Information Resources Acceptable Use.docx
The RSCCD AI Task Force was established to help the District respond to the rapidly evolving opportunities and challenges presented by artificial intelligence. While the Task Force is not currently a formal governance committee, it includes representatives from all District constituencies and operates in the spirit of participatory governance by developing guidance, identifying emerging issues, and seeking feedback through existing governance groups.
Because AI technologies and related guidance are changing quickly, the Task Force
may share recommendations and resources through the AI website to provide timely information
to employees and students. These resources are intended to be living guidance, not
final determinations. Feedback from governance committees remains an important part
of refining that guidance, identifying professional development needs, and informing
future policy development.